In the early 20th century, Albert Einstein presented a series of challenges to the complete quantum theory presented by physicist Max Planck in 1900. This challenge prompted his famous comments, “God does not play dice.” It was believed that everything in the universe has a law and order, and it does not depend on probability as described in quantum theory.
So when he comes to the game of Roulette with the House Edge feature in the casino, he has actually misled the whole world of gambling by making a statement that “nobody can defeat the roulette system unless he steals money when the leader does not see it.” Is the fact that neither the person nor the system can overcome the “house” of the casino 예스카지노?
In the new century, more and more mathematicians and gamblers have discovered that Albert Einstein’s statement is not complete because they believe that Albert Einstein himself knows this and does not want the whole world to know him.
They discovered that “you can not change the home edge feature in a single cycle or bet for roulette games, but you can reduce and remove the home edge edge slowly in a series of cycles.” Do not let this be wrong, it’s not the common way they talk about it.
In the normal progression method suggested by many of your teachers, you can easily bet more than $ 1 million after doubling your bet to 13 times with the $ 25 bet. Most of the progress method failed not only because of the amount of accumulated huge bet required but also the collapse of the sequence when hitting the home edge number (0 and 00).
Recently I read a roulette betting strategy book that claimed roulette system can be beaten in 3 simple steps 1. Reverse the home edge casino player. 2-betting delay 3-platform multi-point betting.
I note that this strategy has in fact exceeded the basic weakness of the normal progression method by delaying the first player’s bet after six similar strikes occurring continuously. At the same time, the strategy has reduced the waiting period by playing several roulette tables at the same time. Another thing I like about this strategy is that the author has already made a structural bet that also includes the edge of the house (0 and 00). It directly reflects the 5.26% home edge advantage of the player.